Friday, 25 September 2026

Friday Five: Daisy reviews

  1. Len Power 12/09/26: The passing scenery outside a train window and the framed school portraits are particularly imaginative and amusing. Everyone has their moment and there are some outstanding performances. This is a funny play and a nostalgic dive back into the literature that people of a certain age grew up with. Canberra Critics Circle: DAISY PULLS IT OFF
  2. Alanna MacLean 12/09/26: It’s a big all-female cast and there are gems all over it. Daisy survives the plots to pull it off | Canberra CityNews
  3. Bill Stephens 14/09/26: quirky stagings for key moments; excellent production standards, the laugh-out-loud moments, and the witty sight gags. Canberra Critics Circle: DAISY PULLS IT OFF – Canberra Repertory
  4. John P Harvey 15/09/26: The production’s most delightful moments arose in using the cast to hold or to become props and scenery: brilliant staging. All of the cast did an amazing job in word and action. Daisy Pulls It Off | Stage Whispers
  5. Simon Tolhurst 19/09/26: All in all. this is a jolly fun romp of a play, with a rich team rolling us through Daisy's first student year as she faces perils, triumphs and a few surprise secrets on her way to a resolutely super-joyous-happy-ending. That Guy who Watches Canberra Theatre: Daisy Pulls It Off, Canberra Rep, 10-26 Sep
  6. Peter Wilkins 20/09/26: Daisy Pulls It Off is an affirmation of gender equality and society’s responsibility to recognize and promote opportunity for all women, irrespective of class or background. In providing this important message in an entertaining production, Rep’s latest production has definitely pulled it off. Canberra Critics Circle: DAISY PULLS IT OFF

Tuesday, 22 September 2026

Blood on the Leaves and Blood at the Root: The Trees


The Trees by Percival Everett
Text Publishing
Pp. 308

This contemporary novel of rage, violence and vengeance is underpinned with supernatural Gothic undertones, like Get Out or other Jordan Peele films, and moments of obvious humour that make it clear this could be a film. People begin showing up dead in hog-tying incidents across the country with seemingly nothing to relate them. The police (Ho, Chi and Minh) are called in to investigate the first death at Money, Mississippi, and they note that at each crime scene there is a second dead body; a disfigured Black man who mysteriously resembles Emmett Till (who was lynched in Money in 1955). It soon transpires that all the white folk brutally murdered have ties to historical racism.
 
The novel is populated with characters from central casting including country bumpkins who pepper their speech with colourful expressions: “Your pappy didn’t have sense enough to pour piss out of a boot with the directions wrote on the heel.” We also encounter a local waitress named Gertrude who could just be a friendly gossip with a notepad, but she seems to know a lot and turns up in many places, such as a speakeasy bar with secret rooms out the back. She invites her friend, scholar Damon Thruff, to town to meet her great-grandmother, Mama Z, an old blind woman with more than a whiff of voodoo magic about her.

Damon has written an academic book on racism, and Mama Z encourages him to witness the more personal and emotive repercussions of this evil. She keeps records: “a file here for nearly every person lynched in this country since 1913.” The files are contained in cabinets which fill rooms, and the names are also embossed on the cover of the book. Damon obsessively transcribes the names he finds in the files. “When I write the names they become real, not just statistics. When I write the names they become real again. It’s almost like they get a few more seconds here. Do you know what I mean? I would never be able to make up this many names. The names have to be real. They have to be real. Don’t they?” Mama Z tells him that, “Every White person in this country, if they didn’t lynch somebody themselves, then somebody in their family tree did.” The names are listed individually within the book, and they occupy four pages. Written history is harder to ignore, and Everett is giving it space.

“They were like zebras, he thought – no one had stripes just like any other, but who could tell one zebra from another? He found it all depressing, not that lynching could be anything but. However, the crime, the practice, the religion of it, was becoming more pernicious as he realised the similarity of their deaths had caused these men and women to be at once erased and coalesced like one piece, like one body. They were all number and no number at all, many and one, a symptom, a sign.”

Damon records the names in pencil, so that “When I’m done, I’m going to erase every name, set them free.” There is power in the recitation of a dead person’s name. Mama Z believes that White people lynch Black men for sport, explaining to Damon, “Less than 1 percent of lynchers were ever convicted of a crime. Only a fraction of those ever served a sentence. Teddy Roosevelt claimed the main cause of lynching was Black men raping White women. You know what? That didn’t happen.”

The retribution is strong and timeless, as Damon and the cops seem of this world but the people they are investigating do not. The linear and logical particulars of the plot do not entirely make sense, but the oppressive feeling and the need for justice are pervasive. Mama Z claims, “Everybody talks about genocides around the world, but when the killing is slow and spread over a hundred years, no one notices. When there are no mass graves, no one notices. American outrage is always for show. It has a shelf life.” Percival Everett is demanding a reckoning, and it hits with the same power as Billie Holiday’s Strange Fruit. Without irony, those Southern trees are doing a lot of heavy lifting.