Kate's Blog
Monday, 2 March 2026
Reflections on Snow...
Friday, 27 February 2026
Friday Five: First Shows of the Year
- Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds - Supersonic Australia, The Domain, Sydney: As part of the Wild God Tour, the band played two shows in January featuring a messianic performance by Mr Cave, a 17-piece ensemble, some of the best backing vocals I have head in a long time, and a supporting cast of bats flying overhead at dusk (the lack of Release the Bats from the set was the only disappointment). Nick Cave is a consumate performer, whether belting out fan-favourites Tupelo and O Children or baring his soul with tunes about his dead son, I Need You (with the repeated refrain, 'just breathe') and Joy. Warren Ellis does Warren Ellis things at the side of the stage as Cave roams, struts and surfs about the place, equally comfortable pounding the piano or stroking the keys, his energy through two and a half hours is obvious in every gesture and facial expression. Jubilee Street is a deliverance for the ages, while more mainstream hits Red Right Hand and The Weeping Song invite the crowd to sing along until there is barely a dry eye in the domain by the time he finishes (us) off with Into My Arms.
- The Book of Mormon - Anne Garfino, Important Musicals and Suzanne Jones, Capitol Theatre, Sydney: A delightful and irreverent pastiche of a show that mocks every genre of musical theatre, cultural hegemony and organised religion while still maintaining a moral code. From the team that brough you South Park comes a musical that skewers itself with outstanding acting, singing, choreography, sets and costumes. From the opening number, Hello! in which we are introduced to a cast of missionaries of the Latter-day Saints, we know there is earnestness up for lampooning. Elders Price (Sean Johnston) and Cunningham (Nick Cox) are paired up and sent to Uganda - not quite the cushy Orlando posting they anticipated. Cue jokes about dictatorship, AIDS, child abuse, blasphemy, and myth making. The songs are memorable and amusing, the sacriligeous Lion-King-inspired Hasa Diga Eebowai and the toe-tapping Turn It Off about supressing unwanted feelings are highlights, and the dream-a-dream ballad Sal Tlay Ka Siti is the version of the song that goes like this (performed by Paris Leveque with wholly convincing naivety in her professional debut). Spooky Mormon Hell Dream is a wonderful excuse to play with props, character and lighting, and the breathtaking audacity of I Am Africa had me wondering how they got away with it. The last word should go to Trey Parker who writes, "There's this line that you can cross all you want as long as you have a reason for doing it. If it has a point and it has a story and it has genuine, real character and emotion, then you can pretty much do whatever you want. There is no line if you're being truthful. We learned that lesson a long time ago."
- You Tell My Mum I'm Dead - Sunspot Productions, The Courtyard Studio: This is an interesting new work from a promising young writer (Emily O'Mahoney), focussing on the Australian 'schoolies' phenomenom where hoards of 18-year-old school leavers descend on beach towns (particularly the Gold Coast and, in this instance, Bateman's Bay) to celebrate their new-found freedom. Gangs of youths, many of whom are away from parental control and experimenting with excessive drugs and alcohol for the first time, flirt, fight and try to figure out who they want to be as they emerge blinking from the confines of adolesence into the bright lights of adulthood. What could possibly go wrong? Director, Kathleen Dunkerley makes some bold choices in their use of space, light and sound effects, accompanied by straightforward acting decisions as they play to the cast's strengths. We spend time in the company of three young women: Cara (Emily O'Mahoney), whose natural performance and final decisive monolgue capture the insecurity of being on the cusp of womanhood; Max (Breanna Kelly), who brings energy and sincerity to an assured performance with unexpectedly emotional anguish; and Layla (Ainslie Bull), with a metaphoric speech about lambs being led to slaughter which could be the crux of the play if delivered with more power. The commitment and engagement from all involved make this an exciting ensemble to watch in future.
- La Souris Blanche - ReAction Theatre, Street 2: Nancy Wake was a New-Zealand born Australian nurse and journalist who joined the French Resistance and later the Special Operations Executive during World War II and briefly pursued a postwar career as an intelligence officer in the Air Ministry. Known as the White Mouse, part of her legendary appeal is due to her insistence on maintaining her femininity amidst guerilla warfare, often taking silk nightgowns, Chanel lipstick and red satin pillows on spying missions in the French mountains. This production, written by Christine Croyden and translated by Véronique Duché is performed entirely in French, to immerse the audience in the language and the atmosphere of the resistance. Surtitles as well as wartime images are projected onto sheets hanging from the top of the stage, ripped and layered to provide entrances and exits, suggesting forests, apartments and nightclubs, all while evoking torn parachutes of downed airmen - both practical and imaginative. Nancy herself is performed by Ionna Gagani and Natalia Nour (as young Nancy) as the agent provocateur prepares to receive a belated award from the Australian government and reflects on her life and the choices that led her here. Flashbacks of her training and actions, including learning to kill silently and the consequences of that ability, are executed with passion, wit and candour. Director Louise Howlett doesn't shy away from the violence, while incorporating the romance and an artistic element through song and dance. There is a lot to the story, and this 80-minute play only peels back a partial couche d'oignon, leaving audience members craving more information, which is surely one of the purposes of drama, n'est-ce pas?
- Bedroom Farce - Canberra Repertory Society, Theatre 3: The play can be pretty dated with its casual references to domestic violence and defined gender roles, as four couples talk about the things that happen behind closed doors. The title is misleading as it is not a farce so much as a sit-com where character interplay matters as much as precision timing. In this, the older couple, Ernest (Pat Gallagher) and Delia (Sally Rynveld) are perfect as the slightly stuffy and bewildered moral compass (think Richard Briers and Penelope Wilton in Ever Decreasing Circles). Their son, Trevor (played with too much posturing and insufficient presence by James Grundoff) has a combative relationship with Susannah (Lara Connolly whose histronics elicit ridicule rather than empathy), who crash the house warming party of practical jokers Malcolm (well-executed bonhomie from Lachlan Abrahams) and Kate (Antonia Kitzel as the centrepiece of the play with a fun and thoughtful performance). Making up the octet are Nick (Rob de Fries has a good line in physical theatre and condescending disdain but is way too old for the role which makes it ick) and Jan (Azerie Cromhout), Trevor's former girlfriend. Although the script frequently mentions her strength and how she would have been a better match for the tempestuous Nick, this is not evident on stage. All the action occurs across a series of bedrooms, delightfully designed by Andrew Kay, showing the character of the couples and allowing continous sightlines and theatrical flow. Despite some good acting and technical elements, the zeitgeist-blind casting of a couple where the man is old anough to be the woman's grandfather and the tone-deaf approach to domestic violence are insurmountable issues.
![]() |
| Ionna Gagani and Natalia Nour as Nancy Wake in La Souris Blanche |
Friday, 20 February 2026
Friday Five: Eating and Drinking in Sydney
2. Encasa
This is a handy stop just round the corner from the Capitol Theatre, where we were going to see a matinee - so we took in lunch and a show. It's a cheerful Spanish taverna which offers tapas, charcuterie and paella. Starting with cocktails while we chose our food, we enjoyed an Agua de Valencia and a Pisco Sour. We felt it was too warm for the rice dish and were concerned that we might nod off after consuming one, although they looked delicious and I'm tempted to return. We shared plates of chorizo a la plancha (grilled spanish sausage), patatas bravas (fired potatoes with spicy tomato and alioli) and croquetas de jamon Iberico (Iberian ham croquettes). The chorizo was a little greasy, the patatas a touch dry and overcooked, but the croquetas were deliciosas; crispy on the outside and gooey creamy goodness on the inside.
![]() |
| Mortadella, salami, olives, house made grissini |
![]() |
| Cannoli, prawn cocktail |
![]() |
| Burrata, cherries, pistachio, balsamic, basil |
![]() |
| Ricotta gnudi, burnt sage butter, pine nuts, raisins |
![]() |
| Conchiglie, smoked Wagyu beef ragù, Parmigiano-Reggiano |
![]() |
| Tiramisù |
Wednesday, 18 February 2026
One-Sided Passion in Multidimensional Play: The Deep Blue Sea
F3; M8
The play
begins as a young woman, Hester Collyer, has attempted to take her own life, although
the gas went out because there wasn’t enough money in the meter. In this
respect, it almost commences with an element of black comedy. Hester is
discovered by the landlady, Mrs Elton, and the couple from upstairs, Anne and
Philip Welch. Mr Miller also gets involved, a mysterious resident of the
tenement who may or may not be a doctor. It transpires that Hester is in love
with Freddie Page and has left her barrister husband, Sir William Collyer, to
be with him, but Freddie doesn’t feel quite the same as she does and is, in
fact, alarmed by her physical passion. “He walks forward and kisses her.
Instantly she responds, with an intensity of emotion that is almost ugly. After
a moment he pushes her away and smacks her playfully.”
Freddie
was an RAF fighter pilot until an accident curtailed his career, and he has
turned to drink, although he still maintains the lingo and bravado. “Funny
things about gongs, when you think what a lottery they were. They don’t mean a
damn thing in war – except as a line-shoot, but in peacetime they’re quite
useful.” When Jackie reminds Freddie that he was “the tops… as a test pilot”,
he replies, “I was – a year ago. Since then things have changed a bit. (He
points to his glass.) This stuff isn’t exactly what the doctor ordered for
nerve and judgment. Besides I’m too ruddy old. You’re finished in that racket
at twenty-five. I wouldn’t last a week. I want something chairborne – not
airborne. I’ve had flying for life.” His staccato speech is in sharp contrast
to Hester’s stillness, and when he first enters, her simple responses which are
made without her once turning to meet Freddie’s eye, creates a cruelly ironic
effect distancing Freddie from the audience’s sympathy.
The play
takes place in one room, over the course of one day, follows one narrative, and
as noted by Dan Rebellato in the introduction, “almost no violent action occurs
on stage. This unshowy preservation of the Aristotelian unities perhaps subtly
encourages an audience to expect a tragic ending.” Instead, there is a final glimmer
of hope, and many contemporary critics felt cheated. Miller thinks Hester may some
talent in her painting which might become a little flame. “Not a great fire,
which could have illumined the world – oh no – I’m not saying that. But the
world is a dark enough place for even a little flicker to be welcome.” Rebellato
champions the play: “The story of Hester Collyer, trapped in a relationship
with a man incapable of returning her love, and her transition from attempted
suicide to groping, uncertain self-determination is handled with extraordinary
economy, precision and power. The depths of despair and desire that Rattigan
plumbs have made The Deep Blue Sea one of his most popular and moving
pieces.” Other reviewers feel it is a brutally bleak meditation on the cruel
consequences of one skirmish between sexual desire and social repression.
Rattigan
was known for putting character ahead of ideas, and for themes of sexual
longing and humiliation. Hester knows that Freddie loves her as much as he ever
did, which means that he doesn’t. He’s not a bad man, but she is passionate
about him and that is not socially acceptable for women in this era. In this
respect, the play in similar to Look Back in Anger to which it is often
compared, usually unfavourably. When asked what he thought about Osborne’s Look
Back in Anger, Rattigan replied that it should have been retitled, ‘Look
how unlike Terence Rattigan I’m being.’ Hester is a tough character to play
without being mawkish, maudlin or melodramatic. She could also be self-pitying
and dull or hard and matter of fact. It’s a fine balance. Hester explains,
“When you’re between any kind of devil and the deep blue sea, the deep blue sea
sometimes looks very inviting.”
Freddie
tells his mate, Jackie Jackson, “A clergyman’s daughter, living in Oxford,
marries the first man who asks her and falls in love with the first man who
gives her an eye. (After a slight pause.) Hell, it’s not that I’m not in
love with her too, of course I am. Always have been and always will. But – well
– moderation in all things – that’s always been my motto. (At the table.)
Have another?” Another touch of black humour in that he is immoderate in drink,
while glibly discussing his lover’s broken heart. Freddie thinks only of
himself, while accusing others of being selfish. “Supposing she’d pulled it off
last night, do you realise what everyone would have said? That I’d bust up a
happy marriage, and then driven Hes to suicide. I’d have been looked on as a
ruddy murderer. Did she think of that, I wonder? Who the hell would have
believed what I’ve just told you?” He is the conventional one, while Hester risks
being a social outcast through her honesty. When having a disagreement with her
husband, she says, “There are polite words and impolite words. They all add up
to the same emotion.”
Collyer
tells Hester that he would happily take her back and that he is even more in
love with her than he was “on our wedding day.” He tells her that Freddie is
reprehensible, with which the audience agrees. “This man you say you love is
morally and intellectually a mile your inferior and has absolutely nothing in
common with you whatever; what you’re suffering from is no more than an ordinary
and rather common infatuation; and it’s your plain and simple duty to exert
every effort of will you’re capable of in order to return to sanity at once.” She
despairs that her husband cannot understand how she feels. “In sober truth
neither you nor I nor anyone else can explain what I feel for Freddie. It’s all
far too big and confusing to be tied up in such a neat little parcel and
labelled lust. Lust isn’t the whole of life – and Freddie is, you see, to me.
The whole of life – and of death, too, it seems. Put a label on that, if you
can.” She will not return to Collyer, as she tells him, “I’m simply a prized
possession that has now become more prized for having been stolen.”
Michael
Billington wrote of The Deep Blue Sea, that it is “as timelessly true as
Phèdre in its portrait of the inequality of passion.” Dan Rebellato considers
that “Rattigan has placed Hester between her father the clergyman, her husband
the judge, and her lover, the ex-airman; Hester’s sexuality is policed by a
repressive triad of church, law and the army.” Philip attempts to take charge
of the situation by telling Hester, “Without trying to be preachy or anything,
it is really the spiritual values that count in this life, isn’t it? I
mean the physical side is really awfully unimportant – objectively thinking,
don’t you think?” A lot of the humour is at Philip’s expense, and he is so
uptight and pompous that he doesn’t notice. When he lectures Hester by
recounting his own experience – “I went away for a fortnight all by myself –
and of course I had hell, but gradually things sort of got clearer in my mind,
and when I got back I was out of the wood.” – she replies, “I’m so glad. Where
was it you went?” His answer, Lyme Regis, deflates him and his specious
argument.
Meanwhile, Miller appears to be the only one who can relate, as he counsels Hester, “To see yourself as the world sees you may be very brave, but it can also be very foolish. Why should you accept the world’s view of you as a weak-willed neurotic – better dead than alive? What right have they to judge? To judge you they must have the capacity to feel as you feel. And who has? One in a thousand. You alone know how you have felt. And you alone know how unequal the battle has always been that your will has had to fight.” This is also a caution to the audience. Miller is amused that Ann should concern herself about Hester’s mental state, when she is physically unharmed. “You make that distinction? Her mind is perfectly sound. There is no trace whatever of any psychotic symptoms which might justify a certificate of insanity.” When Ann asks what made her try to kill herself, Miller answers “(after a slight pause) She wanted to die, I suppose.” Again, this hints at black comedy, although he suspects she “probably will try again, and try again very soon.”
There has
been considerable criticism levelled at Rattigan (as there is to E.M. Forster
in The Inheritance) that he wasn’t open enough about his sexuality – it was
illegal to be homosexual – and that he writes coded characters, such as Mr
Miller. Many people at the time (and me) thought that the reason Miller couldn’t
practice as a doctor was because he had performed an abortion (also illegal),
but modern interpretation believes it is because he was discovered to be gay. Attempted
suicide was also illegal in the 1950s. Miller insists he is not a doctor
although he has all the credentials, and he mocks Collyer with his
understanding of patient confidentiality. “Yes, I’ve heard of it. It’s much the
same as the English schoolboy’s code, isn’t it? No sneaking.”
Rattigan
had a relationship with a man who tried to end his life through gassing himself
and failed – but this doesn’t mean that he has made Hester a male stand-in and
written in code about homosexuality. It is a lot deeper and more complex than
that, as Rebellato explains, “Homosexuality, then, was explored and experienced
through a series of semi-hidden, semi-open codes of behaviour; the image of the
iceberg, with the greater part of its bulk submerged beneath the surface, was frequently
employed. And this image is, of course, one of the metaphors often used to
describe Rattigan’s own playwriting.” He is criticised for smuggling furtively
homosexual themes into his plays and for lacking the courage to confess to his
sexuality both in his plays and his writing – the devil and the deep blue sea,
indeed.
The fear
and repression in palpable. In his obituary of Rattigan, Michael Billington wrote,
“His whole work is a sustained assault on English middle class values; fear of
emotional commitment, terror in the face of passion, apprehension about sex.” Rebellato
argues, “There are traces of gay experience running through The Deep Blue
Sea. The set itself strongly captures the continual fear of exposure felt
by so many homosexual men and women. The room with a communal stairwell right
outside the door is positioned to encourage a constant awareness of
surveillance, with characters perusing each other’s letters, exchanging gossip,
and overhearing one another’s conversations.”
The letter
Hester writes to Freddie is passed around and becomes a plot device, typical of
the ‘well-made play’. Rebellato feels, “There is a fluidity and subtlety in the
way that Rattigan has the suicide note pass from the mantlepiece to the Welches,
then into the pocket of Hester’s dressing gown, and finally into the hands of
Freddie. Rattigan expertly misdirects us, so that we have forgotten about the
letter, until Freddie’s desire for a cigarette leads him to stumble across it...
The same confidence and theatrical economy marks Rattigan’s use of the shilling
which Freddie cruelly offers Hester, ‘Just in case I’m late for dinner’, and
which lies on the table until Hester picks it up in preparation for her second
suicide attempt. Through these devices… Rattigan not only creates a
satisfyingly taut theatrical unity, but reminds us of the dangerous atmosphere
in which these characters live, in which everything is charged with meaning,
and where objects and actions are constantly scrutinised, judged and battled
over.” If we can stop comparing this to Osborne (as if they were both trying to
write the same play) and appreciate it for its own merit, we must conclude that
this is a very fine play indeed.














































