The writing style
is almost breathless, and grammar seems optional as the prose gathers pace
along with the narrative. The author constantly switches point of view so it
appears to be third-person omniscient but we are always in the mind of the subject,
blurring the lines between reality and perception. Helen’s friend Emily employs
Cath as a cleaner; Cath’s brother Damien is the murder victim of a case
investigated by Bailey, Helen’s partner; Damien was killed after a night at the
pub where Joe, Cath’s abusive husband works. There are no easy answers or
definitive source of truth; law and justice are explicitly not the same thing.
Everyone lies to a certain extent,
and no one tells the whole truth to anyone, even themselves. “We are all at
cross purposes, he thought, every one of us a little mad, each of us with a
piece of puzzle in our hands, while the truth floats up there like that big,
black raincloud.” In an attempt to feel better about one’s self-image,
characters believe their own narrative and don’t examine their motives too
closely. Helen is obsessed with home decorating, Cath smells of bleach, Emily dismisses
Cath for suspected theft of perfume – the interior renovation metaphor alludes
to the patina of gloss that covers cracks but doesn’t mend them. Perfume serves
a similar masking purpose. “What a terrible gift was perfume, always given by a
man to make you wear it and please him, while you stank of blackmail.”
Written
in 1994, the novel has an end-of-the-century feminism feel as the author
questions women’s roles and their need to validate themselves in society. Helen
claims to be determinedly independent and happily childfree. “I’d hate to be a megalomaniac
wife and mother. Mothers run a closed book. They shut the world out, close off anything
inconvenient, as if being mum in charge of a family is so self-satisfying, so
sanctifying, they never need have a conscience about anything else.” And yet,
she is yearning for something intangible. “It was useless pretending she was
not influenced by what she saw and read; she was not immune to the contagion of
the romantic or the desire for security purveyed by mothers and magazines…but
she did not quite know how to not want it either, or how to close her ears to
the blandishments of marriage propaganda.”
No comments:
Post a Comment