Friday, 14 May 2021

Friday Five: Moustaches

The no-nonsense reign-of-terror tache of Joseph Stalin
Last week we went to see the shake & stir production of Animal Farm, which was excellent. The person playing the character of Napoleon was sporting a moustache reminiscent of Joseph Stalin - obviously not accidentally. Generally I'm not a big fan of moustaches, but there are certain aspects of this type of facial hair that are instantly recognisable, and have become iconic. On the way home we discussed which ones instantly spring to mind.

  1. Apparently it was once known as the 'toothbrush moustache'; now it can only be seen as the Hitler-tache. It was also popular with Charlie Chaplin (born 1889, the same year as Adolf Hitler) and Oliver Hardy (born 1892). So it seems that for a few years in the early 1990s, if one sported this style of tache, it would be touch and go as to whether one turned into a beloved comedian or a fascist dictator.
  2. Salvador Dali lived his surrealist art through his facial hair - weird and improbable; somewhat nightmarish but certainly memorable. A special mention in this category must go to Hercule Poirot, who was also a twirling tache fan, but since he is fictional, I'm going with the David Suchet representation.
  3. The mid-80s manly actor version as popularised by Tom Selleck and Burt Reynolds. It shouted American TV to me, and I found them strangely off-putting (plus I couldn't tell them apart). I always expect people with this type of tache to speak with an American accent.
  4. Merv Hughes. He was a brilliant bowler who (being Australian) was equally revered and reviled by England fans, crowds of whom used to imitate his warm-up stretches behind him. But when his name is mentioned, the first thing that comes to my mind is that moustache.
  5. For sheer shock factor, Austrian Conchita Wurst stands out with her 2014 Eurovision-winning entry that confused and confronted several viewers and made her a style icon for others. When she accepted the trophy she announced, 'We are unity and we are unstoppable', which she later admitted was a direct message to Vladimir Putin whose administration had implemented a law restricting LBGT rights the previous year. I have never liked a moustache more.     
That's all, folks!

Wednesday, 12 May 2021

Dear John: A Room Made of Leaves


A Room Made of Leaves by Kate Grenville
Text Publishing
Pp. 319

Supposedly this novel is a memoir by Elizabeth Macarthur, “wife of the notorious John Macarthur, wool baron in the earliest days of Sydney”. It is not, and we know it is not through a variety of fictional and literary devices, not least of which is the opening admonishment to “do not believe too quickly”. Kate Grenville has examined papers and letters written by Elizabeth Macarthur, and she tries to suggest what may be hidden between the lines as she reflects upon her sentence construction, and she peppers the memoir with speculation and modern sensibilities in relation to her feelings about ‘the natives’ and gender roles. Seen in this light it is a playful exercise in historical representation.

There are echoes of Eleanor Dark’s Timeless Land trilogy, as the new arrivals to Sydney Cove and Parramatta interact with the locals. Politics and personalities are surmised in short sketches, such as the temperament of Governor Arthur Phillip, and the conflict of struggling to acquire rights to land, of which no one had rightful ownership, is a central theme in the novel.

The premise is that it is Elizabeth who knew about breeding sheep, from her past life being raised on a sheep farm, and that she hid her skills behind her husband’s bombast. It is Elizabeth who is at the centre of images of wool and breeding combined with metaphors of tupping rams and protection of lambs, rather than John Macarthur. Macarthur himself is portrayed less than favourably, as “rash, impulsive, changeable, self-deceiving, cold, unreachable, self-regarding.” His character, however, is also assessed with a modern medical understanding of mental health. “My husband was someone whose judgement was dangerously unbalanced. There was a wound so deep in his sense of himself that all his cleverness, all his understanding of human nature, could be swept aside in some blind butting frenzy of lunatic compulsion.”

Australian $2 note featuring John Macarthur and a merino sheep (designed 1965)

This contemporary approach is echoed in the understanding of gender roles. Elizabeth reflects on the sexual experience with a modern cognisance of rape within marriage. She succumbed to him back in a hedge in Devon early in their courtship when she was flattered by his attentions and interested in what she viewed as an agricultural procedure. The experience left her pregnant and, with no rich protector, marriage was the best option she could hope for. Later, when she sees the treatment of female convicts, she feels compassion. “Mr Macarthur maintained that every one of these women was a harlot who deserved nothing better, but I did not believe him. By now I had learned enough about the narrowness of a woman’s choices to guess that they were not all harlots, only less lucky than I had been.”

Her morals are compromised when she has a liberating sexual affair with William Dawes, the colony’s surveyor, astronomer and mapmaker. This is entirely supposition on Greenville’s part and, although it serves the narrative, one wonders what Macarthur’s descendants make of this fictional fabrication. Dawes instructs Elizabeth in scientific adventure while conducting an erotic entanglement in a secret bower; the ‘room of the leaves’ of the title and the exquisitely designed cover. The parlours and salons of this world are stifling, while the outside world is wild and permissive, which is made abundantly clear. Elizabeth abandons herself to pleasure with another man, and also with herself, exclaiming, “How much better to have your own true self for company than to be lost in the solitude of an unhappy marriage.”

In the midst of the affair, she considers her connection to the particular part of the land on which she has experienced happiness, even though she knows it is ephemeral. The tone is one of the current reflection of reconciliation and understanding of the indigenous ownership of land, which does not seem to be recorded at the time. She knows that she is on Burramattagal land, and, although she takes it from them and farms it for profit, she condemns others who do the same: “Every settler with a deed in his pocket felt entitled to chase away the tribes from the land that he thought now belonged to him by virtue of that piece of paper.” She considers the fact that they “obstinately remained” with something reflective of settlers’ guilt.

The intricate weaving of the woodland copse is reflected in the capricious construction of the narrative, as Grenville teases out fancy from the few facts available. Elizabeth writes of her letters home, “I composed a glorious romance about all this for my mother. I would not lie, not outright. I set myself a more interesting path: to make sure that my lies occupied the same space as the truth. I am reading over the copy now, decades later, with admiration for my young self.” She twists apparently finding fun in this obfuscation, as a demonstration of her wit and intellect, just as Grenville does in her own interpretation.

She addresses us directly as Elizabeth, warning us not to put too much faith in the written word. “And, if I may tease you, my unknown reader, let me remind you that you have only my word for any of this.” This is a novel rich in imagination and confident in structure, which plays with the reader in a way one may find charming or sly, or possibly both.

Portrait of Elizabeth Macarthur by an unknown artist