Thursday, 3 December 2009
Films of the decade?
'Tis the season to compile lists of 'best of's. As it is a year with a 9 at the end, we can extend that for a whole ten years! The latest list from The Times sent to tyrannise me is The 100 Best Films of the Decade. Unlike The Telegraph list of 100 Books That Defined the Noughties, this list goes further by suggesting they are the best films.
I have of course had a look, and find I have seen 41 of their 100. I then realised that The Telegraph had done a list of 100 Films That Defined the Noughties, so I had a look at that too. Curiously, I discovered I had seen 41 of their choices too (20 of which were the same). I neither agree nor disagree with thier order on the list, but these are my comments on what I have seen of their chosen films, in alphabetical order:
28 Days Later: According to Him Outdoors, this is the perfect Valentine’s Day flick. Great opening scene - kind of like The Day of the Triffids but with zombies
About Schmidt: Sometimes I just don’t understand why films get nominated for Oscars
Amelie: Utterly nauseating. Some of my best friends liked it; I try not to hold that against them
Atonement: I liked the film almost as much as the book - high praise, indeed!
Billy Elliot: Any film with The Jam and The Clash on the soundtrack has got to be good, and this is superb
Bend it Like Beckham: Some fantastic actors explain the off-side rule. And some others launch their career
Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan:is niiiice. How that man is still alive is beyond me
Bowling for Columbine: Guns don’t kill people: highly-charged testosterone-fuelled morons do
The Bourne Supremacy / The Bourne Ultimatum: Good action films but I’ve seen better. I suppose they were filmed in tandem (like LOTR) so should get similar kudos, but I wish cinematographers would learn to hold the camera steady!
Brokeback Mountain: What is it about the words ‘short story’ that Ang Lee failed to understand? Two men lie and cheat on their wives – why is this a big deal? Why should I feel sorry for them? Because they’re gay? So what? Lying and cheating is lying and cheating.
Casino Royale: Bond is back – I wasn’t sure about a blonde Bond, but he really is a living action man
Children of Men: In the future there is Clive Owen and no children – I can’t wait!
Chopper: Played ‘drink along a swear word’ to this – got very very drunk
The Constant Gardener: Despite the bland title, this was a spectacularly good film
Control: Great music; great acting (even from Samantha ‘yes, it-would-kill-me-to-smile' Morton); great directing; great city – what more can I say?
Crash: We learn that racism is like so not cool
Dancer in the Dark: Bjork is just plain weird
The Dark Knight: I know it’s sacrilegious, but I preferred Jack Nicholson’s Joker
The Departed: Classy drama/thriller from the in-crowd
The Devil Wears Prada: Saw this on a plane and was surprised to find myself enjoying it. I liked the Meryl Streep character – and Emily Blunt – but wanted to slap the insipid assistant
Downfall: Powerful, frightening, mesmerising, German
Erin Brockovich: Julia Roberts proves she's not just a pretty face
Gladiator: It took a long time for Russell Crowe to worm his way back into my good books after this talent-free epic. I bet he was gutted
Good Night, and Good Luck: I so wanted to like it and yet I can barely remember it
Gomorrah: The matter-of-fact unglamorous violence scared the shit out of me – I never liked Naples much anyway
Gosforth Park: Brilliantly acted upstairs/downstairs drama works on so many levels - ha!
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone: It's not the best but it was the first. Apparently J.K. Rowling stipulated that all the actors must be British, which is why the deries of films remains so fine
In the Loop: One of the best films I’ve seen this year
Kill Bill: Women with good figures everywhere drove blokes wild dressing up in yellow leather. As far as I'm concerned, the 2000s was simply not Tarantino's decade.
I'll continue this later...